Gambling Change Persons and Booth Cashiers vs First-Line Supervisors of Retail Sales Workers
Gambling Change Persons and Booth Cashiers carries the higher exposed share at 44.9% against 41.1%, a gap of 3.8 points. The difference is driven by capability: a current system can simply produce more of the first job's work product than the second's. Release v2026.Q3.
| Occupation | Exposed | Assisted | Untouched | Capability | Friction | Median pay | Rank | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gambling Change Persons and Booth Cashiers | 44.9% | 25.7% | 29.4% | 0.71 | 0.40 | $36,220 | 173 | exposed |
| First-Line Supervisors of Retail Sales Workers | 41.1% | 21.8% | 37.1% | 0.63 | 0.38 | $48,520 | 254 | exposed |
What stands in the way, in each
Gambling Change Persons and Booth Cashiers: the dominant friction is that it runs on knowledge of the organisation that a model cannot hold. Capability sits at 0.71 of 1 and friction at 0.40 of 1.
First-Line Supervisors of Retail Sales Workers: the dominant friction is that it runs on knowledge of the organisation that a model cannot hold. Capability sits at 0.63 of 1 and friction at 0.38 of 1.
Capability asks whether a generally available system can produce the work product at all. Friction asks what stops it finishing the job: physical work, being present, being accountable, unseen context, or the cost of checking the output. The rubric is here.
Read each in full
Exposure is not displacement. A higher score does not rank two jobs by how safe they are, and nothing here models adoption, employment or pay.