Licence the dataset
What is for sale: the ratings, not the website. The site is free and stays free. What an organisation can licence is the underlying measurement, the quarterly deltas, and the right to publish figures derived from them.
What exists
| Asset | Detail |
|---|---|
| Activity ratings | 2,087 detailed work activities, each rated on six dimensions against a published rubric, with the rater and date attached |
| Task scores | 18,838 task statements with exposed, assisted and untouched shares |
| Occupation scores | 923 occupations, importance-weighted, with band counts and task-level contributions |
| Wage and employment join | 767 six-digit SOC codes matched to BLS OEWS, covering 143.6 million US jobs |
| Reliability figures | Eight raters, 40 shared activities, 1,920 paired judgments, published per dimension |
| Quarterly deltas | From v2026.Q4 onward: what moved, by how much, and the stated reason for each movement |
The free endpoint at /data/occupations.json carries the occupation level scores under a CC BY 4.0 licence. Everything below that level, and everything about change over time, is what a licence covers.
Who this is for
Workforce planning and HR platforms. You need to tell an employer which roles in their own structure are changing, not which occupations are changing in general. The task level ratings map onto any competency framework built on O*NET, which is most of them.
Consultancies. A client asking "what does AI do to our operating model" needs a defensible number with a method they can show the board. Ours is published, arguable at the level of a single activity, and re-scored on a fixed cadence.
Investors and analysts. The quarterly series is the part that cannot be reconstructed after the fact. A snapshot can be replicated in a week. A record of what moved each quarter, starting from a fixed reference date, accrues only to whoever ran it.
Educators and training providers. Curriculum decisions need to know which parts of a role are moving and which are held by licensure or embodiment, because those two things imply completely different course design.
Researchers and journalists. Academic and non-commercial use of the published figures is free under CC BY 4.0. You do not need to ask. Cite the release identifier.
What a licence includes
- The full ratings table with every dimension, not just the aggregate score
- The task to activity mapping as scored, including excluded tasks and why
- Every released quarter, so the series is usable rather than just the latest snapshot
- Advance access to the next release before it publishes
- The right to publish derived figures with attribution
- Written answers on method, because a number nobody can interrogate is not useful to you
What it does not include
- Influence over any score. This is not negotiable and it is the reason the rest is
worth anything. Ratings are assigned against the rubric before any commercial conversation, corrections are issued as numbered errata, and no licensee sees a score before it is fixed. See the disclosure.
- Exclusivity. The measurement is published. Nobody gets to be the only holder of it.
- Bespoke scoring of your own job architecture as part of the standard licence. That is
separate work and is quoted separately.
Pricing
Priced per organisation and per use, because a single analyst desk and a platform embedding the scores for a hundred thousand employees are not the same thing. Tell us which you are and what you want to do with it, and you will get a number and a plain licence, not a discovery process.
Academic and newsroom use of the published figures needs no licence and no conversation.
Contact
[email protected] reaches the people who built it. Say what you want to do, what scale you are at, and when you need it. Include the release identifier if you are asking about a specific figure.
A.I.T. Multiverse Consulting Ltd, Nicosia, Cyprus.