The Task Exposure Indexv2026.Q3
Occupation · SOC 29-1229.05 · Job Zone 5

AI exposure: Preventive Medicine Physicians

Apply knowledge of general preventive medicine and public health issues to promote health care to groups or individuals, and aid in the prevention or reduction of risk of disease, injury, disability, or death. May practice population-based medicine or diagnose and treat patients in the context of clinical health promotion and disease prevention.

Reading this score

computed

Preventive Medicine Physicians is one of the unusual cases where capability and friction are both high. Current systems can produce a great deal of this work, with average capability across its tasks at 2.5 out of 4. Only 32.2% of the weighted task load comes out as exposed, because 29.0% of it runs into something structural. Jobs in this band tend not to disappear. They change shape, and the person stays.

What holds the line here is verification cost. Across this occupation's 15 tasks it averages 2.27 out of 3, the highest of the five friction dimensions. In plain terms, checking the output costs more than producing it. Where an undetected error is expensive, dangerous or irreversible, the economics change. Someone has to verify the work, and verifying can cost as much as doing it. This is the friction most likely to fall as tools for checking improve.

The most exposed thing this job does is Evaluate the effectiveness of prescribed risk reduction measures or other interventions, at 66.7%. The least is Teach or train medical staff regarding preventive medicine issues, at 5.0%. A gap of 61.7% between two parts of the same job is the reason this index publishes at task level. An occupation-wide number would have hidden both.

Within healthcare practitioner and technical occupations, this one is more exposed than most. The median across the 89 roles in the group is 18.4%, and only 4 of them score higher than this. Occupational families are not uniform, and the spread inside them is often wider than the gap between them.

What would move this score. Of 15 tasks, 9 are currently banded exposed, 4 assisted and 2 untouched. For that distribution to shift materially would take a change in who is permitted to sign the work, which is a question for regulators rather than for engineers. The score is re-computed every quarter against a fresh capability reference, and the change is published rather than quietly applied.

Where the score comes from

judged

Every task is scored through the standardised work activities it maps to. These are this occupation’s averages on the six rubric dimensions. Capability is what AI can do; the other five are what stands in the way.

DimensionMeanScale
Capability2.470-4
Embodiment0.530-3
Presence1.170-3
Accountability1.900-3
Context1.900-3
Verification cost2.270-3

What this means in practice

Roles in this band tend to change shape rather than disappear. The output gets drafted faster and the person moves toward review, judgment and accountability. The useful question is not whether to use these tools but who is trusted to sign off on what they produce.

Task by task

15 tasks, O*NET 31.0
TaskExposedAssistedUntouchedImportanceBand
Evaluate the effectiveness of prescribed risk reduction measures or other interventions.66.7%33.3%0.0%4.17exposed
Document or review comprehensive patients' histories with an emphasis on occupation or environmental risks.56.7%43.3%0.0%4.25exposed
Identify groups at risk for specific preventable diseases or injuries.45.0%30.0%25.0%4.21exposed
Provide information about potential health hazards and possible interventions to the media, the public, other health care professionals, or local, state, and federal health authorities.45.0%30.0%25.0%4.06exposed
Coordinate or integrate the resources of health care institutions, social service agencies, public safety workers, or other organizations to improve community health.45.0%30.0%25.0%3.94exposed
Design, implement, or evaluate health service delivery systems to improve the health of targeted populations.45.0%30.0%25.0%3.84exposed
Deliver presentations to lay or professional audiences.45.0%30.0%25.0%3.56exposed
Design or use surveillance tools, such as screening, lab reports, and vital records, to identify health risks.26.7%23.3%50.0%4.21exposed
Develop or implement interventions to address behavioral causes of diseases.26.7%23.3%50.0%3.63exposed
Prepare preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses, alternative solutions, and recommendations.23.3%26.7%50.0%3.89assisted
Perform epidemiological investigations of acute and chronic diseases.20.0%30.0%50.0%4.21assisted
Direct or manage prevention programs in specialty areas such as aerospace, occupational, infectious disease, and environmental medicine.16.7%33.3%50.0%4.59assisted
Direct public health education programs dealing with topics such as preventable diseases, injuries, nutrition, food service sanitation, water supply safety, sewage and waste disposal, insect control, and immunizations.16.7%33.3%50.0%4.17assisted
Supervise or coordinate the work of physicians, nurses, statisticians, or other professional staff members.5.0%20.0%75.0%4.21untouched
Teach or train medical staff regarding preventive medicine issues.5.0%20.0%75.0%4.05untouched

Task text and importance ratings sourced from O*NET 31.0. Shares computed. The occupation score is the importance-weighted mean.

Occupations either side of this one

The four closest scores in the same occupational family, then the four closest anywhere in the index.

Read this carefully. Exposure is not displacement. A high score means current AI systems can produce this work, not that anyone will stop paying a person to do it. Adoption depends on economics, regulation and inertia that this index deliberately does not model. How the score is built.